Here's how most offshore staffing works:
You tell an agency you need a "customer service representative" or a "bookkeeper." They find someone with that job title on their CV. You pay. You hope it works out.
The problem? Job titles tell you nothing about productivity.
Two bookkeepers with identical qualifications can have wildly different completion times for bank reconciliation. One might take 2.5 hours. Another might take 90 minutes. Traditional agencies have no way to know, and no mechanism to improve.
This is why 70-85% of offshore relationships fail to meet expectations. It's not that offshore doesn't work. It's that the industry measures the wrong things.
Tasks take longer than they should, but you can't prove it
Quality is inconsistent, but you can't pinpoint why
You're paying for hours worked, not work completed
When something goes wrong, nobody knows how to fix it
You end up managing more, not less
The root cause is simple: When you hire for roles instead of optimising for tasks, you're building on sand.
Task-based optimisation starts with a simple question: What specific work needs to be done?
Not "what role do you need to fill?" Not "how many hours do you want?" But: what are the actual tasks, how long should they take, and how can we make them better?
This shift in thinking changes everything.
The Five-Step Framework
STEP 1
Every role is actually a collection of tasks. A "customer service representative" might handle ticket triage, response drafting, escalation routing, and satisfaction follow-ups. Each task has different requirements, different tools, and different optimisation potential.
We work with you to decompose roles into their component tasks. This gives us something we can actually measure and improve.
STEP 2
Here's where our approach becomes impossible to replicate quickly.
We track task performance across our entire staff base: 90,000+ task completions every month. We know how long bank reconciliation should take. We know the accuracy rate to expect from data entry. We know which tasks benefit from AI assistance and which don't.
When we onboard your work, we're not guessing. We're comparing against a dataset no competitor has.
STEP 3
Not every task benefits from AI. Our data shows that approximately 77% of business tasks still require human judgment: context, relationships, exceptions, creativity.
But for the 23% where AI accelerates work? The gains are substantial. Invoice categorisation becomes 45% faster. First-draft responses write themselves. Data extraction that took hours takes minutes.
We don't apply AI everywhere. We apply it precisely where our data proves it works.
STEP 4
Every month, you receive task-level performance data. Not timesheets → actual productivity metrics.
How long did each task type take?
How does that compare to benchmark?
Where are the improvement opportunities?
What's the trend over time?
This transparency creates accountability. It also creates a continuous improvement cycle that compounds over time.
STEP 5
Because we measure at task level, we can guarantee at task level.
Our 180-day guarantee isn't just "we'll replace someone if you're unhappy." It's backed by data. If task performance doesn't meet agreed benchmarks, we make it right with specific improvements, not vague promises.
We don't make claims without data. Here's what task optimisation actually delivers, drawn from our work across multiple industries and thousands of monthly task performances.
| Task Category | Specific Task | Improvement | What This Means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Accounting & Finance | Bank reconciliation | 40% faster | 2.5 hours → 1.5 hours per reconciliation |
| Invoice processing | 35% reduction | 8 minutes → 5.2 minutes per invoice | |
| Expense categorisation | 45% faster | With 99% accuracy maintained | |
| Month-end close | 50% faster | Systematic process optimisation | |
| Customer Service | Ticket resolution | 45% faster | 18 minutes → 10 minutes average |
| Customer onboarding | 35% reduction | Streamlined workflows | |
| Query categorisation | 70% faster | AI-assisted routing | |
| Administrative | Data entry | 50% more accurate | 97% → 98.5% accuracy |
| Calendar management | 60% fewer conflicts | Systematic scheduling | |
| Email processing | 45% faster | Triage and response | |
| Marketing | Social media scheduling | 60% more efficient | Batch processing optimisation |
| Content formatting | 50% faster | Template-driven workflows | |
| Campaign setup | 40% time reduction | Repeatable processes |
These figures represent averages across our client base. Your specific results will depend on your current baseline, task complexity, and volume. The Calculator provides a personalised estimate based on your situation.
The AI conversation in business has become polarised. One camp says AI will automate everything. The other dismisses it as hype. Both are wrong.
Our data tells a more nuanced story.
Pattern recognition at scale: Categorising invoices, routing tickets, flagging anomalies
First-draft generation: Email responses, report templates, meeting summaries
Data extraction: Pulling figures from documents, standardising formats
Repetitive calculations: Reconciliation matching, variance identification
For these tasks, AI augmentation delivers 35-70% efficiency gains. We train every staff member on the right tools for their specific task mix.
Relationship judgment: When to escalate, how to handle a frustrated client
Context understanding: Why this invoice is unusual, what this exception means
Creative problem-solving: Novel situations, edge cases, strategic thinking
Quality assurance: Catching what automation misses, ensuring accuracy
This is why the 70-85% AI project failure rate exists. Organisations implement AI expecting broad productivity gains, only to find it struggles with tasks that require human judgment. Then they're surprised when quality collapses.
We don't ask "can AI do this?" We ask "does AI improve this task's outcome, based on our data?"
Sometimes the answer is yes. Often it's no. Always, it's evidence-based.
The result: AI augmentation that actually works, because it's applied precisely - not everywhere.
This methodology wasn't invented in a strategy document. It was forged in the operational reality of managing 400+ concurrent projects over a decade.
Outrun's parent company, Zeald, has delivered digital services to New Zealand businesses for 25 years. At peak, the team managed more than 400 active client projects simultaneously - each with deadlines, dependencies, and quality requirements.
That environment demanded systematisation.
You can't manage that volume with informal processes and hope. You need:
Clear task definitions
Measurable performance standards
Predictable workflows
Continuous improvement mechanisms
Over 9,000+ projects, patterns emerged. We learned which tasks benefited from specialisation. Which tools accelerated specific workflows. How to identify improvement opportunities before they became problems.
When we built Outrun, we systematised those learnings into a repeatable methodology. Every client benefits from a decade of operational refinement - not a theoretical framework designed by consultants who've never run a business.
This is the experience gap that takes years to build.
An offshore provider could start collecting task data tomorrow. They'd be 12-18 months away from having enough to be useful. And the institutional knowledge of what those patterns mean comes from a decade of operational learning, not a dataset alone.
Task optimisation isn't a one-time event. It's a continuous cycle.
Task performance data collected automatically through our systems.
Analysis identifies improvement opportunities - tasks taking longer than benchmark, accuracy variations, tool utilisation gaps.
Recommendations implemented - additional training, workflow adjustments, tool updates. Your performance report delivered.
A 5% monthly improvement might seem modest. But compounded over 12 months, that's 80%+ cumulative gains. Small, consistent optimisations add up to transformation.
This is why our longest-standing clients see the biggest improvements. They've had time for the cycle to compound.
If you've read this far, you understand why task optimisation matters. The question is what it could mean for your specific business.
That depends on:
Which tasks consume the most time in your operation
What your current baseline looks like
Which tasks have the highest optimisation potential
How much volume you're dealing with
The fastest way to find out is our Task Savings Calculator.
In two minutes, you'll see personalised estimates based on your tasks, your hours, and benchmarks from businesses like yours.
No consultation required. No commitment. Just clarity on what's possible.
Select your tasks, input your hours, see what businesses in your industry typically save with Outrun. Based on 90,000+ monthly task benchmarks.
2 minutes. Instant results. No consultation required.
Our team can help you identify which tasks have the highest optimisation potential - and whether Outrun is the right fit.
Traditional offshore staffing focuses on filling a role. You get a person, you hope they're good, and you manage them like any employee. Task optimisation focuses on specific workflows. We measure performance at task level, apply AI where it helps, and guarantee outcomes - not just presence.
Our methodology scales down effectively. Even a single offshore team member performs dozens of distinct tasks. The question isn't size: it's whether you want to measure and improve, or hope for the best.
Most clients see measurable improvement within the first 60 days. The full benefit of continuous optimisation compounds over 6-12 months as we refine workflows and identify additional opportunities.
The methodology requires our systems, training, and data infrastructure. If you have existing offshore staff elsewhere, we'd typically recommend running a comparison. Bring one role to Outrun and measure the difference.
2025 © Outrun.global | Privacy Policy | Term of Service | Acceptable Use Policy | Data Processing Addendum | Modern Slavery Policy